origin 9.2 software originpro 2015 Search Results


algorithms fiji imagej  (LI-COR)
99
LI-COR algorithms fiji imagej
Algorithms Fiji Imagej, supplied by LI-COR, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/algorithms fiji imagej/product/LI-COR
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
algorithms fiji imagej - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
anti brevican mouse monoclonal antibody  (TaKaRa)
97
TaKaRa anti brevican mouse monoclonal antibody
Anti Brevican Mouse Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by TaKaRa, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti brevican mouse monoclonal antibody/product/TaKaRa
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti brevican mouse monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
device-related aes  (Janssen)
90
Janssen device-related aes
Device Related Aes, supplied by Janssen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/device-related aes/product/Janssen
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
device-related aes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
prodisc-c total disc replacement  (Janssen)
90
Janssen prodisc-c total disc replacement
Randomized Controlled Trials of Cervical Artificial Disc <t> Replacement </t> Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
Prodisc C Total Disc Replacement, supplied by Janssen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/prodisc-c total disc replacement/product/Janssen
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
prodisc-c total disc replacement - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
et al, 92 2015 united states ide rct  (Janssen)
90
Janssen et al, 92 2015 united states ide rct
Randomized Controlled Trials of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
Et Al, 92 2015 United States Ide Rct, supplied by Janssen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/et al, 92 2015 united states ide rct/product/Janssen
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
et al, 92 2015 united states ide rct - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
chi-square test  (CH Instruments)
90
CH Instruments chi-square test
Randomized Controlled Trials of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
Chi Square Test, supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/chi-square test/product/CH Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
chi-square test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
inf orthod kieferorthop  (Georg Thieme Verlag KG)
90
Georg Thieme Verlag KG inf orthod kieferorthop
Randomized Controlled Trials of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
Inf Orthod Kieferorthop, supplied by Georg Thieme Verlag KG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/inf orthod kieferorthop/product/Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
inf orthod kieferorthop - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
epigallocatechin-3-gallate  (Dawley Inc)
90
Dawley Inc epigallocatechin-3-gallate
Randomized Controlled Trials of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
Epigallocatechin 3 Gallate, supplied by Dawley Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/epigallocatechin-3-gallate/product/Dawley Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
epigallocatechin-3-gallate - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
liquid chromatography isotope ratio mass spectrometer lc-irms  (Thermo Fisher)
90
Thermo Fisher liquid chromatography isotope ratio mass spectrometer lc-irms
Randomized Controlled Trials of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
Liquid Chromatography Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometer Lc Irms, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/liquid chromatography isotope ratio mass spectrometer lc-irms/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
liquid chromatography isotope ratio mass spectrometer lc-irms - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
treeage pro 2015  (treeage software)
90
treeage software treeage pro 2015
Randomized Controlled Trials of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
Treeage Pro 2015, supplied by treeage software, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/treeage pro 2015/product/treeage software
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
treeage pro 2015 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gt1 infection  (Gilead Sciences)
96
Gilead Sciences gt1 infection
Randomized Controlled Trials of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
Gt1 Infection, supplied by Gilead Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gt1 infection/product/Gilead Sciences
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gt1 infection - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
evolut r  (CoreValve Inc)
90
CoreValve Inc evolut r
Randomized Controlled Trials of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
Evolut R, supplied by CoreValve Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/evolut r/product/CoreValve Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
evolut r - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Randomized Controlled Trials of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease

Journal: Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series

Article Title: Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Health Technology Assessment

doi:

Figure Lengend Snippet: Randomized Controlled Trials of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease

Article Snippet: Health care resource use and QALYs were prospectively obtained from the randomized, multicentre study and post-approval study of ProDisc-C total disc replacement for IDE (Murrey et al, 22 2009; Janssen et al, 92 2015).

Techniques:

Cervical Implant Devices Used in Randomized Controlled Trials of C-ADR Versus Fusion for Degenerative Disc Disease

Journal: Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series

Article Title: Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Health Technology Assessment

doi:

Figure Lengend Snippet: Cervical Implant Devices Used in Randomized Controlled Trials of C-ADR Versus Fusion for Degenerative Disc Disease

Article Snippet: Health care resource use and QALYs were prospectively obtained from the randomized, multicentre study and post-approval study of ProDisc-C total disc replacement for IDE (Murrey et al, 22 2009; Janssen et al, 92 2015).

Techniques: Functional Assay

Cervical Motion at Treated and Adjacent Sites After C-ADR or Fusion

Journal: Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series

Article Title: Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Health Technology Assessment

doi:

Figure Lengend Snippet: Cervical Motion at Treated and Adjacent Sites After C-ADR or Fusion

Article Snippet: Health care resource use and QALYs were prospectively obtained from the randomized, multicentre study and post-approval study of ProDisc-C total disc replacement for IDE (Murrey et al, 22 2009; Janssen et al, 92 2015).

Techniques: Software

Secondary Surgeries in Longer-Term Follow-Up of C-ADR– Versus Fusion–Treated One-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease

Journal: Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series

Article Title: Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Health Technology Assessment

doi:

Figure Lengend Snippet: Secondary Surgeries in Longer-Term Follow-Up of C-ADR– Versus Fusion–Treated One-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease

Article Snippet: Health care resource use and QALYs were prospectively obtained from the randomized, multicentre study and post-approval study of ProDisc-C total disc replacement for IDE (Murrey et al, 22 2009; Janssen et al, 92 2015).

Techniques: Migration

Randomized Controlled Trials of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease

Journal: Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series

Article Title: Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Health Technology Assessment

doi:

Figure Lengend Snippet: Randomized Controlled Trials of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease

Article Snippet: Janssen et al, 92 2015 United States IDE RCT, 13 sites , 7 yr 92%/92% , Index-level secondary surgery rate 0.9% (n = 1) , Index-level (only) secondary surgery rate 7.8% (n = 8) 8 index-only procedures included 3 supplemental fixation, 1 plate removal, and 4 revisions) , , In third follow-up report, overall 7-yr secondary surgery rate was significantly lower in C-ADR group (7% vs. 18%, P = .02) Incidence rate ratio for secondary surgery at index level was significantly greater for fusion group (3.09, 95% CI = 1.7–8.45, Pw = .0099 [Cox proportional hazard rate with Anderson-Gill model] Incidence rate ratio for secondary surgery at adjacent level was also greater for fusion group 3.64 (P = .0103).

Techniques:

Cervical Implant Devices Used in Randomized Controlled Trials of C-ADR Versus Fusion for Degenerative Disc Disease

Journal: Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series

Article Title: Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Health Technology Assessment

doi:

Figure Lengend Snippet: Cervical Implant Devices Used in Randomized Controlled Trials of C-ADR Versus Fusion for Degenerative Disc Disease

Article Snippet: Janssen et al, 92 2015 United States IDE RCT, 13 sites , 7 yr 92%/92% , Index-level secondary surgery rate 0.9% (n = 1) , Index-level (only) secondary surgery rate 7.8% (n = 8) 8 index-only procedures included 3 supplemental fixation, 1 plate removal, and 4 revisions) , , In third follow-up report, overall 7-yr secondary surgery rate was significantly lower in C-ADR group (7% vs. 18%, P = .02) Incidence rate ratio for secondary surgery at index level was significantly greater for fusion group (3.09, 95% CI = 1.7–8.45, Pw = .0099 [Cox proportional hazard rate with Anderson-Gill model] Incidence rate ratio for secondary surgery at adjacent level was also greater for fusion group 3.64 (P = .0103).

Techniques: Functional Assay

Cervical Motion at Treated and Adjacent Sites After C-ADR or Fusion

Journal: Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series

Article Title: Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Health Technology Assessment

doi:

Figure Lengend Snippet: Cervical Motion at Treated and Adjacent Sites After C-ADR or Fusion

Article Snippet: Janssen et al, 92 2015 United States IDE RCT, 13 sites , 7 yr 92%/92% , Index-level secondary surgery rate 0.9% (n = 1) , Index-level (only) secondary surgery rate 7.8% (n = 8) 8 index-only procedures included 3 supplemental fixation, 1 plate removal, and 4 revisions) , , In third follow-up report, overall 7-yr secondary surgery rate was significantly lower in C-ADR group (7% vs. 18%, P = .02) Incidence rate ratio for secondary surgery at index level was significantly greater for fusion group (3.09, 95% CI = 1.7–8.45, Pw = .0099 [Cox proportional hazard rate with Anderson-Gill model] Incidence rate ratio for secondary surgery at adjacent level was also greater for fusion group 3.64 (P = .0103).

Techniques: Software

Adjacent-Segment Disease at Longer-Term Follow-Up of C-ADR

Journal: Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series

Article Title: Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Health Technology Assessment

doi:

Figure Lengend Snippet: Adjacent-Segment Disease at Longer-Term Follow-Up of C-ADR

Article Snippet: Janssen et al, 92 2015 United States IDE RCT, 13 sites , 7 yr 92%/92% , Index-level secondary surgery rate 0.9% (n = 1) , Index-level (only) secondary surgery rate 7.8% (n = 8) 8 index-only procedures included 3 supplemental fixation, 1 plate removal, and 4 revisions) , , In third follow-up report, overall 7-yr secondary surgery rate was significantly lower in C-ADR group (7% vs. 18%, P = .02) Incidence rate ratio for secondary surgery at index level was significantly greater for fusion group (3.09, 95% CI = 1.7–8.45, Pw = .0099 [Cox proportional hazard rate with Anderson-Gill model] Incidence rate ratio for secondary surgery at adjacent level was also greater for fusion group 3.64 (P = .0103).

Techniques: Modification

Secondary Surgeries in Longer-Term Follow-Up of C-ADR– Versus Fusion–Treated One-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease

Journal: Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series

Article Title: Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Health Technology Assessment

doi:

Figure Lengend Snippet: Secondary Surgeries in Longer-Term Follow-Up of C-ADR– Versus Fusion–Treated One-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease

Article Snippet: Janssen et al, 92 2015 United States IDE RCT, 13 sites , 7 yr 92%/92% , Index-level secondary surgery rate 0.9% (n = 1) , Index-level (only) secondary surgery rate 7.8% (n = 8) 8 index-only procedures included 3 supplemental fixation, 1 plate removal, and 4 revisions) , , In third follow-up report, overall 7-yr secondary surgery rate was significantly lower in C-ADR group (7% vs. 18%, P = .02) Incidence rate ratio for secondary surgery at index level was significantly greater for fusion group (3.09, 95% CI = 1.7–8.45, Pw = .0099 [Cox proportional hazard rate with Anderson-Gill model] Incidence rate ratio for secondary surgery at adjacent level was also greater for fusion group 3.64 (P = .0103).

Techniques: Migration

Secondary Surgery in Longer-Term Follow-Up of C-ADR– Versus Fusion–Treated Two-Level Degenerative Disc Disease

Journal: Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series

Article Title: Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Health Technology Assessment

doi:

Figure Lengend Snippet: Secondary Surgery in Longer-Term Follow-Up of C-ADR– Versus Fusion–Treated Two-Level Degenerative Disc Disease

Article Snippet: Janssen et al, 92 2015 United States IDE RCT, 13 sites , 7 yr 92%/92% , Index-level secondary surgery rate 0.9% (n = 1) , Index-level (only) secondary surgery rate 7.8% (n = 8) 8 index-only procedures included 3 supplemental fixation, 1 plate removal, and 4 revisions) , , In third follow-up report, overall 7-yr secondary surgery rate was significantly lower in C-ADR group (7% vs. 18%, P = .02) Incidence rate ratio for secondary surgery at index level was significantly greater for fusion group (3.09, 95% CI = 1.7–8.45, Pw = .0099 [Cox proportional hazard rate with Anderson-Gill model] Incidence rate ratio for secondary surgery at adjacent level was also greater for fusion group 3.64 (P = .0103).

Techniques: Migration, Modification